Garmin R50 Accuracy Tests Results from @LetsDrivethru
A detailed test of the Garmin R50 by @letsplaythru was conducted under the following conditions and considerations:
Course Environment: The device was tested on a golf course with varying elevations, tree cover, and open fairways.
Weather Conditions: The test was conducted under typical morning playing conditions.
Comparison Devices: The R50’s accuracy was checked against known course markers and other golf GPS or rangefinder devices.
Distance Checks: Measurements were taken at multiple locations, including Tee boxes, Fairway positions, Approach shots, and Green distances (front, middle, and back).
Slope Adjustments: The device’s slope-adjusted yardages were compared to manual calculations and other slope-enabled rangefinders.
GPS Signal Reliability: The R50’s GPS connectivity was monitored for stability, particularly when moving between holes or playing under tree cover.
Speed of Updates: The responsiveness of yardage updates when changing position was assessed.
Overall Verdict:
The Garmin R50 demonstrated solid accuracy in most scenarios, with only small discrepancies that did not significantly impact usability.
In particular, these are detailed findings
Distances: The R50’s distance readings were compared to known markers and other devices. It generally provided reliable measurements but had occasional minor deviations.
Green Reading Accuracy: The device’s green readings, including front, middle, and back yardages, were consistent with expectations, though slight variations were noted under specific conditions.
Slope Adjustments: The R50’s slope-adjusted distances appeared accurate compared to manual calculations and competitor devices.
GPS Performance: The unit maintained strong GPS connectivity, but minor inconsistencies existed when transitioning between holes or areas with dense tree cover.